Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs the Baltimore Ravens match was one of the most statistically rich and entertaining games of the NFL season. From explosive passing plays to dominant rushing performances, this contest showcased elite quarterback play, physical ground attacks, and momentum-shifting moments, as reflected in the player stats.
This article delivers a comprehensive, data-driven breakdown of the game, covering team and individual stats, advanced metrics, scoring flow, and tactical analysis, all presented in a clean, SEO-friendly format.
Match Overview
Matchup: Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Baltimore Ravens
Competition: NFL Regular Season
Venue: Raymond James Stadium
Final Score:
Baltimore Ravens – 41
Tampa Bay Buccaneers – 31
While the Buccaneers started strong and controlled time of possession, the Ravens demonstrated superior efficiency, explosive playmaking, and red-zone execution, which ultimately decided the outcome.
Final Score by Quarters
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltimore Ravens | 0 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 41 |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 10 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 31 |
Team Performance Comparison
Overall Team Stats
| Category | Ravens | Buccaneers |
|---|---|---|
| Total Yards | 508 | 481 |
| Passing Yards | 264 | 356 |
| Rushing Yards | 244 | 125 |
| Offensive Plays | 54 | 78 |
| Yards Per Play | 9.4 | 6.2 |
| Time of Possession | 24:55 | 35:05 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 2 |
| Penalties | 9 | 8 |
| Penalty Yards | 85 | 75 |
Tactical Summary
- Tampa Bay dominated possession but struggled to convert long drives into consistent points.
- Baltimore relied on explosive plays and efficiency, scoring quickly with fewer snaps.
- The Ravens’ run-pass balance forced Tampa Bay’s defense into constant mismatches.
Passing Game Analysis
Baltimore Ravens – Passing Stats
| Player | Comp / Att | Yards | TDs | INTs | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamar Jackson | 17 / 22 | 281 | 5 | 0 | 158.1 |
Performance Breakdown
Lamar Jackson delivered one of the most efficient performances of the season:
- Averaged 12.8 yards per completion
- Accounted for five passing touchdowns
- Zero interceptions despite aggressive downfield throws
- Consistently punished Tampa Bay’s secondary with play-action
Jackson’s ability to read coverage pre-snap and extend plays made Baltimore’s offense unpredictable and lethal.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers – Passing Stats
| Player | Comp / Att | Yards | TDs | INTs | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Mayfield | 31 / 45 | 370 | 3 | 2 | 97.5 |
Performance Breakdown
Baker Mayfield produced substantial raw numbers: High passing volume, excellent connection with short and intermediate routes, and effective late-game scoring. However: Two interceptions shifted momentum, pressure forced rushed decisions, and red-zone efficiency lagged behind Baltimore.
Rushing Game Breakdown
Ravens Rushing Stats
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg | Long | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | 15 | 169 | 11.3 | 81 | 0 |
| Lamar Jackson | 9 | 52 | 5.8 | 17 | 0 |
| Zay Flowers | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 19 | 0 |
Rushing Impact
Derrick Henry completely altered the defensive structure: Forced stacked boxes, opened play-action lanes, and created explosive second-level runs. Even without a rushing TD, Henry’s dominance was one of the most significant statistical factors in the game.
Buccaneers Rushing Stats
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg | Long | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachaad White | 10 | 40 | 4.0 | 8 | 0 |
| Bucky Irving | 9 | 23 | 2.6 | 6 | 1 |
| Sean Tucker | 5 | 29 | 5.8 | 15 | 0 |
| Baker Mayfield | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 12 | 0 |
Tampa Bay’s rushing attack struggled with: Limited explosive runs, poor red-zone success, and difficulty breaking first contact.
Receiving Stats – Full Breakdown
Baltimore Ravens Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rashod Bateman | 4 | 121 | 30.3 | 1 | 59 |
| Mark Andrews | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 2 | 20 |
| Justice Hill | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 1 | 18 |
| Derrick Henry | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 1 | 13 |
| Isaiah Likely | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 10 |
Key Observation: Baltimore spread the ball efficiently, scoring touchdowns with running backs, tight ends, and wide receivers, making defensive adjustments extremely difficult.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cade Otton | 8 | 100 | 12.5 | 0 | 23 |
| Mike Evans | 8 | 88 | 11.0 | 1 | 25 |
| Rachaad White | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 2 | 23 |
| Jalen McMillan | 8 | 15 | 1.9 | 0 | 15 |
Otton and Evans were reliable targets, while White emerged as a versatile receiving threat out of the backfield.
Defensive & Turnover Stats
| Category | Ravens | Buccaneers |
|---|---|---|
| Sacks | 3 | 2 |
| QB Hits | 7 | 5 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 0 |
| Forced Fumbles | 1 | 1 |
Baltimore’s defense capitalized on mistimed throws, pocket pressure, and coverage disguises. Those turnovers directly translated into scoring opportunities.
Third-Down & Red-Zone Efficiency
| Metric | Ravens | Buccaneers |
|---|---|---|
| Third Down | 3 / 8 (37.5%) | 11 / 17 (64.7%) |
| Red Zone TDs | 4 / 5 | 3 / 5 |
Despite Tampa Bay’s impressive third-down rate, Baltimore’s red-zone dominance proved far more valuable.
Game Flow & Momentum Analysis
First Quarter
The Buccaneers controlled the tempo. Balanced offense and strong opening drive. Ravens are still adjusting defensively.
Second & Third Quarters
Ravens scored 34 unanswered points. Play-action passing exposed Tampa’s linebackers. Defensive pressure forced mistakes.
Fourth Quarter
The Buccaneers mounted a late comeback. Ravens answered every score efficiently. Clock management sealed the win.
Head-to-Head Matchup Insights
- Ravens’ offensive efficiency historically outperforms Tampa Bay in recent meetings.
- Baltimore’s mobile QB + power run combination consistently challenges the Buccaneers’ defensive schemes.
- Tampa Bay thrives on possession, but struggles against explosive offenses.
Key Player of the Match
⭐ Lamar Jackson (Baltimore Ravens)
5 Passing TDs | Over 280 passing yards | Added rushing value | Near-perfect decision-making
Jackson’s performance was the defining factor of the game.
Final Thoughts
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs the Baltimore Ravens match player stats clearly show why Baltimore emerged victorious: Elite quarterback efficiency, dominant rushing performance, superior red-zone execution, and timely defensive takeaways. Tampa Bay showed resilience and offensive depth, but Baltimore’s ability to score quickly and efficiently made the difference.
